<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m switching back to Firefox &#8230; eventually</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wagedomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/why-im-switching-back-to-firefox-eventually/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wagedomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/why-im-switching-back-to-firefox-eventually/</link>
	<description>East coast technology blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wagedomain</title>
		<link>http://wagedomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/why-im-switching-back-to-firefox-eventually/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>wagedomain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wagedomain.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-325</guid>
		<description>@volvox

As a web developer I run into that css problem all the time, too. Firefox and Firefox 2 both still fail the acid2 css test, although much better than IE7 obviously. Firefox 3 also fails in some builds apparently (as I experienced earlier today). 

I completely agree with you for what it's worth. To be fair to the IE team, though, they have been much more responsive lately. I think that IE can be good again, it will just take some time to get over the wounds of the past, so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@volvox</p>
<p>As a web developer I run into that css problem all the time, too. Firefox and Firefox 2 both still fail the acid2 css test, although much better than IE7 obviously. Firefox 3 also fails in some builds apparently (as I experienced earlier today). </p>
<p>I completely agree with you for what it&#8217;s worth. To be fair to the IE team, though, they have been much more responsive lately. I think that IE can be good again, it will just take some time to get over the wounds of the past, so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: volvox</title>
		<link>http://wagedomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/why-im-switching-back-to-firefox-eventually/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>volvox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wagedomain.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I always had problems with IE not rendering html/css correctly. Firefox does (or does it much better than IE). Firefox is my favorite because - contrary to IE - it is made by a lot of people listening to people. Not a bucnh of higly paid programmers that obey to their boss. IE7 is still driven by Activex, a whole bunch of it. Last, the memory 'problem' with Firefox is 'cosmetic'only. It does not really use the memory it shows in the task manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always had problems with IE not rendering html/css correctly. Firefox does (or does it much better than IE). Firefox is my favorite because - contrary to IE - it is made by a lot of people listening to people. Not a bucnh of higly paid programmers that obey to their boss. IE7 is still driven by Activex, a whole bunch of it. Last, the memory &#8216;problem&#8217; with Firefox is &#8216;cosmetic&#8217;only. It does not really use the memory it shows in the task manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
